
LegalMike
LegalMike is a Dutch AI legal assistant covering every area of Netherlands and EU law. Built by Novitec B.V. for legal professionals, it answers questions with traceable official sources inside a closed environment that requires no prior anonymisation.
What is LegalMike?
LegalMike is an AI legal assistant published by Novitec B.V., a company based in Groningen (KvK 90900375) in the Netherlands. Its tagline promises a smart AI assistant in every area of law, deep, intuitive and secure, and the product is organised around four modes: question and answer, case guidance, deepening, and a writing assistant.
The scope is deliberately narrow. LegalMike reads Dutch legislation, including local by-laws, alongside European directives and regulations, Dutch and EU case law, international treaties, the whole body of Dutch case law including disciplinary rulings, more than 12,000 open access legal publications, parliamentary history and public legal web sources. Niche bodies such as Kifid, the RvA, SKGZ, the ECtHR, SGZ, RSJ, CvT and the Tuchtraad Verzekeraars are covered. It is not a generalist assistant, and it does not cover other national legal systems.
Behind the interface sits Golden Retriever, a retrieval-augmented generation engine with its own legal knowledge layer of validated relationships and reasoning patterns. Every answer carries its sources, which can be opened at their original location. That traceability is the argument the publisher makes against generic chatbots, together with legal depth, freshness, and the fact that files need no prior anonymisation before being uploaded. The language models are hosted by OpenAI Europe on a European endpoint, under a zero data retention agreement.
There are three ways in. The web application at app.legalmike.ai is the main one. A LegalMike agent runs inside Microsoft 365 Copilot, in Word, Outlook, Teams and Copilot Pages, with no licence beyond Copilot itself. And the Golden Retriever MCP server can be connected to an organisation's own AI stack; the product page presents it as model-agnostic, usable with Gemini, Claude or ChatGPT.
Customers named on the site include Univé Rechtshulp, the municipalities of Arnhem, Leeuwarden (launching customer) and Waterland, Olympia, Flanderijn, SmeetsGijbels, Dommerholt Advocaten and Meester Leonie Strafrechtadvocaten. The publisher claims to have supported more than 5,000 professionals on AI, while a press interview cites 15 employees and more than 3,000 lawyers trained. Alongside the application, Novitec also sells ChatGPT and Copilot training, which is a separate service.
What it does
- Ask a legal question and get a reasoned answer with its official sources attached
- Submit a case with its documents and be guided step by step to a tailored opinion
- Search the whole body of Dutch case law, including disciplinary rulings, for a specific decision
- Turn an opinion into a draft memo or letter that follows your own templates and preferences
- Check a document against the legislation currently in force
- Summarise a ruling in one click
- Use LegalMike as an agent inside Microsoft 365 Copilot, from Word, Outlook or Teams
When to use LegalMike / When not to
A quick filter to help you decide if LegalMike is the right fit.
When to use LegalMike
- Lawyers and in-house counsel whose work sits inside Dutch and European law, the only two bodies of law the tool covers
- Legal researchers who need every answer to come back with a citable official source they can open and check
- Firms and teams bound by professional secrecy: the closed environment means files do not have to be anonymised before they are uploaded
- Public-sector and insurance legal teams dealing with administrative law, objection procedures, claims handling and duty-of-care questions
- Organisations running Microsoft 365 Copilot, or with their own development capacity: the LegalMike agent needs no extra licence, and the Golden Retriever MCP server plugs into an in-house AI stack
When not to use LegalMike
- Practitioners working under any national law other than Dutch: the corpus is Dutch legislation, European law and Dutch and EU case law
- Anyone tempted to use the output as-is: the terms state that it results from algorithmic predictions and is not necessarily correct, so it must always be checked
- Private individuals looking for legal advice, since the product is sold to legal professionals
- Very tight budgets: there is no permanent free plan and entry costs EUR 130 excluding VAT per month for a single user
- Teams that need a non-Dutch interface, the application itself having been observed in Dutch
How to use LegalMike
A typical end-to-end flow, from setup to results.
- Start the 14-day trial from the site's Start proefperiode button, which opens the sign-up page of the web application
- Create the account, or sign in with a Microsoft account from the login screen
- Go through the digital onboarding included from the Single plan; Enterprise customers get personal onboarding instead
- Ask your question, or drop in a case and add the relevant documents: contracts, letters, factual context
- Let the assistant read your input, since it gives proactive feedback and asks context questions before answering
- Read the answer with its sources, and open each source at its original location or follow the related ones
- Continue with the follow-up questions it suggests, or with your own, in the same chat
- Switch to the writing assistant to turn the opinion into a memo or a letter that follows your own templates
- Copilot route: open Microsoft 365 Copilot, add the LegalMike agent, then use it from Word, Outlook or Teams, three steps announced as active within minutes
- MCP route: connect the Golden Retriever MCP server to your own AI environment rather than building the retrieval logic yourself
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Every answer carries its official sources, checkable at their original location
- A corpus that is broad and specifically Dutch: local by-laws, disciplinary case law, parliamentary history and niche bodies such as Kifid, SKGZ and the RvA
- Processing and storage entirely inside the EEA, with the customer database on servers in Amsterdam
- No training on customer data, and zero data retention on the model side
- No prior anonymisation required, with compliance to the NOvA professional secrecy guidelines claimed
- Unlimited questions and cases, with no quota on any plan
- AES-256-GCM encryption at rest, TLS 1.2/1.3 in transit, a per-user key for uploaded files, and an annual third-party penetration test whose last campaign returned no Critical or High findings
Cons
- Scope limited to Dutch and European law, with no other national legal system covered
- No permanent free plan, only a 14-day trial
- A high entry price for a sole practitioner at EUR 130 excluding VAT per month, and the Team plan requires at least 2 users, so EUR 240 excluding VAT per month minimum
- No mobile application, on iOS or Android
- The application interface was observed in Dutch only
- API and MCP documentation is not published: it goes through a sales contact
- The site contradicts itself on two published figures: retention of 30 days in the privacy statement against three months in the general terms, and a response time of 48 hours on the home and pricing pages against three working days on the contact page
Pricing & Plans
There is no permanent free plan. Access starts with the Single plan at EUR 130.00 excluding VAT per month on monthly billing, which is the real entry point; the same plan falls to EUR 100.00 excluding VAT per month on an annual commitment, billed yearly. The Team plan is priced per user, at EUR 120.00 excluding VAT per user per month on monthly billing (EUR 92.00 on annual billing), and requires at least two users, so EUR 240.00 excluding VAT per month at minimum. Enterprise pricing is available on request only, with no public amount. A free 14-day trial is offered: nothing is due if it is cancelled before the end, and the subscription starts automatically afterwards.
- one user
- professional secrecy guaranteed with no need to anonymise
- access to the full body of Dutch law
- European law
- local by-laws
- disciplinary case law and public legal literature
- unlimited questions and cases
- a personal writing assistant and digital onboarding
- everything in Single
- from 2 users up (so EUR 240.00 excl. VAT per month minimum)
- support on working days from 9:00 to 17:00
- a single invoice for the team
- advanced administration features and a dedicated contact
- everything in Team
- plus more users
- custom integrations and sources
- an account manager
- extended support and personal onboarding
- 14 days
- nothing to pay if cancelled before the end
- after which the chosen subscription starts automatically
- all amounts are excluding VAT and the annual commitment is displayed as -30% against monthly billing
Data, GDPR & hosting
A consolidated view of how LegalMike handles your data.
GDPR overview
GDPR implementation is stated explicitly and in concrete terms. LegalMike declares compliance with the AVG and with the AI Act, where an independent assessment classified it as a limited-risk AI system meeting the article 4 (AI literacy) and article 50 (transparency) obligations. The data processing agreement is not a separate document but article 9 of the general terms version 1.1, in force since 11 February 2026: it grants the customer an audit right (30 days' written notice, at its own cost) and sets breach notification at 72 hours maximum. Data subject rights listed are access, rectification, erasure, restriction, objection and portability, with privacy@legalmike.ai as the contact point and the Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens as supervisory authority. A processing register is kept internally, and privacy by design and by default are claimed. No article 27 representative is designated, the publisher being established in the EU.
Who owns the data?
Under the general terms (art. 8.4), the customer keeps its intellectual property rights over the input it submits and receives an irrevocable right of use over the output. LegalMike acts as processor for the web application, the customer as controller. Stored questions, answers and uploaded files are encrypted inside the customer's own environment and accessible to that customer alone; users delete their history and files at any time, and an organisation can disable uploads entirely. The publisher only obtains a licence over input and output where end users explicitly opt in to service improvement, and article 8.8 forbids using the output to develop models, algorithms or software.
Reuse rights
The customer receives an irrevocable right of use over the output and keeps its rights over its own input, so answers and drafts can be reused in its own files, memos and letters without asking permission. Two limits apply: the contractual duty to check everything, since the terms state the output is not necessarily correct, and article 8.8, which forbids using the output to develop models, algorithms or software. On the publisher's side, customer data is not used to train AI models, at LegalMike or at OpenAI, under a zero data retention agreement, and LegalMike has no default access to user data. The single exception is voluntary: if a user rates an answer and consents to that chat being opened, LegalMike's own lawyers may review the reasoning, for that chat only and for thirty days at most. Nothing is shared with third parties beyond contracted processors, except on official order or legal obligation.
Data retention & training
Hosting summary
All customer data is processed and stored within the European Economic Area, and the publisher states that this covers the whole chain: the customer database on servers in Amsterdam, processing by the language model, text extraction from uploaded documents, and back-ups. No transfer to countries outside the EEA takes place, according to the security page. The language models are hosted by OpenAI Europe through a European endpoint, and article 9.2 of the general terms commits the supplier to hosting services located in the European Union only. Back-ups are encrypted in two layers and kept in Europe, on a rotation of 7 daily, 4 weekly and 24 monthly copies, with restores tested periodically. One nuance deserves attention: the privacy statement mentions a processor outside the EU that handles telemetry data only, under GDPR export safeguards. That sits alongside the security page's blanket statement that no transfer outside the EEA occurs, and the site does not reconcile the two. The marketing site itself resolves to 85.10.159.223, in the Netherlands (AS34762 Combell NV), which is the brochure site's infrastructure and not the application hosting.
Things to keep in mind
Risks and trade-offs to weigh before adopting LegalMike.
- The general terms exclude any warranty of accuracy: output comes from algorithmic predictions the supplier does not control, must always be checked by a human, and is used at the customer's own risk. Leaning on it without reading the cited sources is exactly the failure the contract anticipates.
- Deskilling is a real risk over time: an assistant that finds the ruling and drafts the memo can quietly erode the research reflex of junior lawyers who never learn to look for the source themselves.
- The site contradicts itself on retention: 30 days in the privacy statement against three months in article 4.9 of the general terms. Neither figure is withdrawn, and the gap is worth settling in writing before sensitive files are uploaded.
- Announced response times also diverge: 48 hours on the home and pricing pages, three working days on the contact page.
- No named list of subprocessors is published, although the security page states they are named in the data processing agreement; the published agreement (art. 9.11) describes categories instead. The privacy statement also mentions a non-EU processor handling telemetry data under GDPR export safeguards, which has to be read against the security page's statement that no transfer outside the EEA takes place.
- Certifications must be attributed carefully. LegalMike says only that it completed the road to ISO 27001 certification in 2026, with no certificate number and no certifying body named. The ISO 27001, 27017, 27018 and 27701, SOC 2 Type II and CSA STAR certifications quoted belong to OpenAI, and the ISO 27001, ISO/IEC 25010:2023 and NEN 7510 certifications belong to Researchable, the IT partner. None of them are LegalMike's own.
- Contract details that can surprise later: article 8.9 grants the publisher an irrevocable licence to use the customer's name and logo on its website; customer and contact data are kept for 5 years after the services end, extended to 20 years where liability is at stake; and the subscription starts automatically when the 14-day trial expires.
Setup & Integrations
Technical difficulty
Low for the web application: you sign up online, there is nothing to install, login works by email or Microsoft account, and digital onboarding is included from the Single plan. The Copilot route is presented in three steps, open Microsoft 365 Copilot, add the LegalMike agent, use it in Word, Outlook or Teams, and is announced as active within minutes. Only the MCP route is demanding: it targets organisations with their own development capacity, though the server supplies the retrieval logic, filters and ranking. Administrators still configure 2FA and role-based access on their side.
Deployment
Integrations
Supported languages
Behind LegalMike
Fundraising
Social
Resources
All the official URLs gathered for verification and reference.
Alternatives
Tools that compete with or complement LegalMike.
Frequently asked questions
Which areas of law does LegalMike cover?
Are the answers sourced?
Is there a free trial or a permanently free plan?
What does it cost to get started?
Is there a cap on the number of questions?
Is my data used to train AI models?
Where is my data hosted?
Do I have to anonymise documents before uploading them?
How long is my data kept?
Can I use LegalMike inside Microsoft 365 Copilot?
Should you pick LegalMike?
LegalMike is a niche tool and makes no secret of it. It works on Dutch and European law and nothing else, which settles at once whether it is relevant to a given practice. Within that scope the corpus is unusually deep: local by-laws, disciplinary case law, parliamentary history, more than 12,000 open access publications and specialised bodies a generalist assistant would never reach.
Three arguments carry the product: depth of sources, traceability, and confidentiality. Traceability matters most in practice, since every answer opens onto the official texts it rests on, which makes the output auditable by a professional who stays responsible for it. Confidentiality is the best documented: processing inside the EEA, a customer database on servers in Amsterdam, no training on customer data, zero data retention on the models, AES-256-GCM at rest, an annual external penetration test, and the claim that no prior anonymisation is needed under the NOvA guidelines. A dedicated security page sets all of this out, together with an AI Act classification as a limited-risk system.
The reservations are real but ordinary. There is no free plan, and EUR 130 excluding VAT per month is a genuine commitment for a sole practitioner. There is no mobile application, and the MCP documentation is not public. The site also contradicts itself in two places, on retention and on response times, which a buyer should raise before signing rather than after.
Adoption is visible: municipalities, an insurer's legal aid arm and several named law firms appear on the site. For a Dutch legal team that already checks its own work and wants a research assistant it can cite from, LegalMike is worth its price. For anyone working outside Dutch and EU law, it is simply the wrong tool.
- Choosing a selection results in a full page refresh.
- Opens in a new window.