JuridicAlly
JuridicAlly is an Austrian legal AI platform for practising lawyers. It combines full-text RIS case-law research, complete court-file analysis and the drafting of civil and criminal appeals, and is billed on request through TBAi Software Solutions GmbH.
What is JuridicAlly?
JuridicAlly is a modular AI platform built for one jurisdiction and one profession: Austrian law, practised by Austrian lawyers. It is published by TBAi Software Solutions GmbH, constituted in Innsbruck in June 2025 by three founders — a practising Rechtsanwalt as CEO, an AI architect as CTO and a consultant as COO. The product leans hard on that provenance, presenting itself as made in Austria, for Austrian law.
Three modules are sold. RISearch handles research. Its deeper mode, RISearch 2.0, answers a legal question with what the company calls commentary quality, drawing on the entire RIS — the federal legal information system — and other Austrian sources; a lighter Judikatur Suche is tuned to Supreme Court and Higher Regional Court decisions and returns Rechtssätze sorted by relevance. Both work semantically rather than by keyword, link judgments, statutes and commentary together, cite verified sources and highlight the passages that matter. A typical run is put at one to four minutes, the depth adapting to the complexity of the question.
The Berufungs-Agent attacks the heaviest pleading in Austrian practice. Given a complete court file as PDF, specialised agents analyse it in parallel, identify the available grounds of appeal, research the relevant case law and return a structured draft. It covers civil and criminal appeals and includes a separate module for civil Berufungsbeantwortungen.
Ally is the case assistant. Point it at a case folder and it reads every document, understands how the pieces connect, then answers questions on the state of the file, drafts claims, defences, objections, preparatory pleadings and motions, dissects an opposing expert report for methodological weaknesses, and generates question catalogues for parties, witnesses and experts. Drafts are edited inside the application — select a passage and have the AI rework it — with automatic versioning and export to Word.
Access is restricted by the terms to businesses and, above all, to persons entitled to represent parties professionally; consumers are excluded. Nothing is priced publicly: both tiers are quoted on request, and the way in is a demonstration booked through the contact form.
What it does
- Search the whole Austrian RIS semantically and rank the results by relevance
- Find and explain OGH and OLG case law bearing on a specific question
- Read an entire case folder and answer questions about the state of the proceedings
- Identify grounds of appeal and produce a structured draft, in civil or criminal matters
- Draft claims, defences, objections, preparatory pleadings and motions from the file
- Analyse an expert report, find its weak points and build a question catalogue
- Edit the draft in the app with versioning, then export it to Word
When to use JuridicAlly / When not to
A quick filter to help you decide if JuridicAlly is the right fit.
When to use JuridicAlly
- Austrian civil litigators who need OGH and OLG case law located and ranked in minutes rather than hours
- Criminal defence practitioners preparing an appeal, where the agent identifies the grounds and returns a structured draft
- Solo practitioners and small firms with no research department, since licences are sold per workstation
- Litigators who must take apart a court-appointed expert's report and walk into the hearing with a question catalogue
- Firms bound by professional secrecy that want an unconditional no-training commitment and processing kept inside the EU
When not to use JuridicAlly
- Consumers: the terms exclude private and non-professional use outright, by name
- Lawyers practising outside Austria, since the corpus is the Austrian RIS and the OGH and OLG case law
- Buyers who need to see a price before opening a commercial conversation
- Teams wanting to embed legal AI into their own systems, as there is no API and no developer documentation
- Anyone expecting mobile access, a self-service sign-up or a free trial of the product
How to use JuridicAlly
A typical end-to-end flow, from setup to results.
- Request a demonstration through the contact form; there is no self-service sign-up
- Agree the modules you need, then wait for TBAi to accept expressly and activate the licence
- Confirm at registration that you are entitled to represent parties professionally
- Connect your case folder so that Ally can read every document in it
- Ask a legal question in plain language, or set out the facts, to start a RISearch query
- Allow one to four minutes for the search, the depth adapting to the complexity
- Review the ranked hits, the verified citations and the highlighted passages
- Upload a complete court file as PDF when you want to run the appeal agent
- Edit the generated draft in the app, selecting passages for the AI to rework
- Restore an earlier version if you need to, then export the result to Word
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Genuine specialisation in Austrian law and the RIS, rare among legal AI tools
- Training on customer data is excluded outright, in three separate clauses
- Content is deleted immediately once results are delivered; logs live 30 days at most
- Processing on EU servers under TLS 1.3, with an Article 28 agreement built into the terms
- The publisher is fully identifiable: FN 656053 i, VAT ATU82234547, address and telephone
- Covers criminal as well as civil appeals, including the heaviest pleading of all
- An explicit AI Act position, with generated content labelled and responsibility left with the lawyer
Cons
- No published price at all: both tiers read Preis auf Anfrage on all three product pages
- No free plan and no documented trial; the free demo is a sales appointment, not product access
- No API and no developer documentation, so nothing can be built on top of the tool
- No mobile application and no social presence of any kind
- Austrian law only, and the site exists solely in German
- No subprocessor list is published although the terms foresee engaging further processors
- Licences are per workstation, and the terms impose documented annual AI training on your staff
Pricing & Plans
No price is published. Both advertised tiers, Standard and Enterprise Lösung, are quoted as Preis auf Anfrage, and this is consistent across all three product pages. There is no permanent free plan and no documented free trial: the free demonstration is a sales appointment rather than access to the product. The terms state that all fees are expressed in euros plus statutory VAT, and describe the structure as an agreed base tariff, billed monthly or annually, combined with a usage-based component such as credits, transaction or query volume, and optionally bookable modules. Prices may be revised on thirty days' notice where infrastructure or third-party costs rise substantially, in which case the customer holds an extraordinary right of termination.
- Standard — Preis auf Anfrage. Bundles RISearch 2.0
- Judikatur Suche and access to the whole RIS together with Ally and the appeal agent
- the feature list shown varies by product page and also covers case-folder ingestion
- drafting of pleadings
- expert-report analysis
- in-app editing
- versioning and Word export
- with personal support
- Enterprise Lösung — Preis auf Anfrage. Multi-user licence covering all features
Data, GDPR & hosting
A consolidated view of how JuridicAlly handles your data.
GDPR overview
Compliance is claimed explicitly and repeatedly: DSGVO-konform appears on the homepage, the about page and all three product pages. The concrete mentions are unusually specific. The controller is named as TBAi Software Solutions GmbH, Gumppstraße 53, 6020 Innsbruck; the competent supervisory authority is given as the Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde, with address and email; a dedicated data protection address, datenschutz@juridically.at, is published. Access, rectification, erasure, restriction, objection, portability and the right to complain are all listed. An Article 28 processing agreement is an integral part of the terms, and processing is described as taking place on EU servers under TLS 1.3. The software is separately classified as a limited-risk AI system under Article 3(3) and Article 50(2) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification is claimed anywhere.
Who owns the data?
Under the terms the customer remains the controller within the meaning of the GDPR, and TBAi Software Solutions GmbH acts only as a processor under Article 28, working on the customer's documented instructions. Everything the customer uploads or generates stays theirs, and a separate Article 28 processing agreement forms an integral part of the conditions. The software moves in the opposite direction: source code, algorithms, design elements and documentation remain with TBAi or its licensors, and the customer receives only a temporary, revocable, non-transferable right of use tied to a single workstation. Working material — chat histories, processed data and notes — is held locally, on the customer's own system.
Reuse rights
The customer may use the output freely within their own mandates, but the licence is deliberately narrow: it covers only matters in which the customer personally acts as representative, and use for a third party's case is excluded. TBAi reserves the right to refuse a job where it suspects the file belongs to someone else. In the other direction TBAi's own reuse rights are close to nil: the terms rule out any use of customer data for training, fine-tuning or evaluating AI models, and further processors may be engaged only with documented consent. One exception runs the other way — TBAi may cite the customer's name and logo as a reference unless the customer objects.
Data retention & training
Hosting summary
The privacy policy states that all transmitted data is encrypted to TLS 1.3 and processed on secure servers within the European Union. No individual country is named, so the jurisdiction can be stated only at EU level. The terms add transport encryption, encrypted storage, access controls and logging, and specify that TBAi acts strictly on the customer's documented instructions. A local-first principle applies to the working material: chat histories, processed data and notes are held on the customer's own system rather than centrally. The publisher is established in Austria and Austrian law governs the contract, which places the arrangement squarely inside the EU. One qualification is worth making: the marketing site itself resolves to an Amazon address in Frankfurt, Germany, but that describes where the website is hosted and is not a statement about where customer content is processed. Separately, and only where statistics or marketing cookies are accepted, website analytics data may reach Google LLC in the United States under the EU-US Data Privacy Framework and standard contractual clauses.
Things to keep in mind
Risks and trade-offs to weigh before adopting JuridicAlly.
- Outputs are machine-generated drafts, and the terms say so plainly: validity, accuracy and legal soundness remain yours to check, and responsibility for what is filed stays with the lawyer
- A tool that reads the whole file and proposes the next step can quietly erode the close reading that catches what no search surfaces; the better it performs, the easier that habit is to lose
- The Impressum invokes German law (§ 5 TMG, §§ 8-10 TMG) although the publisher is Austrian and the terms choose Austrian law: a template residue suggesting the legal pages were not fully reworked
- The privacy policy is dated January 2025, five months before the company was constituted, so its last-updated date cannot be relied on as an effective date
- TBAi's liability is limited to intent and gross negligence, and indirect loss, consequential loss and lost profit are excluded as far as the law permits
- The contract makes the firm responsible for documented annual AI training of every authorised member of staff, an obligation easy to overlook at signature
- No subprocessor list is published although the terms foresee engaging further processors, so the full processing chain cannot be inspected before signing
Setup & Integrations
Technical difficulty
Administratively demanding, technically light. There is no self-service sign-up: you request a demonstration, agree the modules, and TBAi activates the licence after expressly accepting and taking your declaration that you may represent parties professionally. Day-to-day use then needs no engineering — you connect a case folder or drop a court file in as PDF, and there is no API, key or webhook to wire up. The one lasting obligation is organisational rather than technical: the terms require documented annual AI training for every authorised member of staff.
Deployment
Integrations
Supported languages
Behind JuridicAlly
Resources
All the official URLs gathered for verification and reference.
Frequently asked questions
Which legal system does JuridicAlly cover?
How much does it cost?
Is my data used to train AI models?
Where is data processed, and how long is it kept?
Is a data processing agreement available?
Who is allowed to subscribe?
Is there an API or a mobile app?
Can I try it before buying?
Who publishes the tool?
How does it stand under the EU AI Act?
Should you pick JuridicAlly?
JuridicAlly is a narrow tool, and deliberately so. It does not try to be a general legal assistant: it works on Austrian law, for people entitled to represent parties in Austrian courts, and its value stands or falls on how well it handles the RIS, the OGH and OLG case law, and the appeal brief. For a Tyrolean or Viennese firm doing contentious work, that focus is the point — a generalist model with no RIS access is not a substitute.
The data posture is unusually clean for this corpus. Training on customer data is excluded outright rather than made opt-out, content is deleted as soon as results are delivered, logs last thirty days, processing sits on EU servers under TLS 1.3, and an Article 28 agreement is part of the contract rather than a document to chase. For a profession bound by professional secrecy, those are the right commitments in the right places.
Against that, the commercial opacity is total. Neither tier carries a price on any of the three product pages, there is no trial and no free plan, and the only way in is a demonstration booked through a form. Buyers who need to compare costs before talking to a salesperson will find nothing to work with. There is no API, no mobile app and no social presence, and the company is young — constituted in June 2025, first archived in January 2026.
Two details deserve a second look before signing: the Impressum cites German statutes although the publisher is Austrian and the contract chooses Austrian law, and the privacy policy is dated five months before the company existed. Neither undermines the substantive identity data, which checks out against the Austrian commercial register, but both suggest legal pages assembled from a template and not fully reworked.
- Choosing a selection results in a full page refresh.
- Opens in a new window.