UXMagic
UXMagic is an AI UI generator that turns a text prompt, a sketch, a screenshot or a website URL into high-fidelity screens, then exports them as editable Figma layers or as production-ready HTML, React and Tailwind code.
What is UXMagic?
UXMagic is an AI interface generator that sits between a rough idea and a shippable front end. It accepts four kinds of input, and that breadth is the heart of its pitch: a text prompt, a hand-drawn sketch, a screenshot, or the URL of a site to rebuild. Existing Figma files can be imported too, so an established design system constrains what the model produces rather than the other way round. From any of these, the tool returns high-fidelity screens in seconds.
Where most tools in this category stop at a picture, UXMagic produces two artefacts at once. The first is a Figma-ready design: one click sends fully editable auto-layout layers into Figma, and a community plugin lets the same generation happen inside a Figma file that is already open. The second is code, exported as responsive HTML, React and Tailwind. The vendor is candid about the limit: the front-end foundation is meant to be production quality, but backend logic still has to be written by a developer.
Several modes shape how the generation runs. Flow Mode builds an entire multi-screen journey from one prompt instead of a screen at a time. Wireframe Mode produces low-fidelity structure first, for teams that plan before they polish. Sectional Editing rewrites a single block without regenerating the page around it. A style guide generator produces colours, typography, spacing and components that then apply consistently across screens. Exports also reach Framer and Webflow.
For developers, an MCP server published on npm connects the workspace to Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code, Claude, Codex and Antigravity, so designs can be read, generated and exported from inside the editor with an API key. Collaboration is handled with per-project email invitations or a shareable link. Everything runs on credits, consumed by each generation and each export.
The company behind it was founded in 2024 and claims 50,000 designers, two million interfaces generated and 29,000 companies, alongside a 4.8 out of 5 Trustpilot rating from 118 reviews.
What it does
- Generate high-fidelity UI screens from a plain text prompt
- Turn a screenshot or a hand-drawn sketch into an editable interface
- Rebuild the layout of any website from its URL alone
- Produce a whole multi-screen user flow from a single prompt with Flow Mode
- Export finished screens to Figma as editable auto-layout layers
- Export production-ready HTML, React and Tailwind code for developer handoff
- Generate a brand style guide and apply it across every generated screen
When to use UXMagic / When not to
A quick filter to help you decide if UXMagic is the right fit.
When to use UXMagic
- UI and UX designers who want a structured first draft instead of a blank canvas, then refine it in Figma
- Product managers who need to show a multi-screen flow before writing a single line of specification
- Startup founders with no design background who have to put a credible interface in front of users or investors
- Front-end developers who would rather start from exported HTML, React and Tailwind than rebuild a mockup by hand
- Freelancers and small agencies juggling several client projects, who need unlimited projects and 250 Figma exports a month
When not to use UXMagic
- Teams that need a working back end: the vendor states plainly that backend logic still has to be implemented by a developer
- Organisations with documented compliance requirements: nothing on the site mentions the GDPR, a DPA, a subprocessor list or a hosting country
- UX researchers looking for user testing, interview analysis or product analytics, none of which this tool offers
- Companies that need a self-hosted or on-premise deployment, or a native mobile app: the product is web-only, plus a Figma plugin and an MCP server
- Buyers who want a safety net before committing, since the terms rule out refunds on both subscriptions and credit purchases
How to use UXMagic
A typical end-to-end flow, from setup to results.
- Create an account from the Start for Free button; the free plan asks for no credit card
- Pick your input: a text prompt, Clone a URL to rebuild an existing site, or Image to UI to upload a screenshot or sketch
- Optionally choose a visual style and a corner radius before generating, to steer the look
- Optionally import your Figma components or design system so the AI works inside your brand
- Run the generation; the tool rewrites your input into a structured prompt on the way
- Switch to Flow Mode when you need the whole multi-screen journey rather than a single screen
- Refine the result: edit a section on its own, change copy inline, and upload your own images
- Generate a style guide and apply its colours, typography and components across the screens
- Export with Copy to Figma for editable layers, or Copy Code for HTML, React and Tailwind
- For an IDE workflow, generate a UXMagic API key, install the MCP server and paste the configuration into Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Antigravity or Claude Desktop following the docs
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Four genuinely different inputs, prompt, sketch, screenshot and URL, plus Figma import, which is unusual in this category
- Design and code come out together, so the tool does not stop where the developer's work begins
- The Figma relationship works both ways: layers go out editable, and an existing design system comes in to constrain generation
- A permanent free plan with 30 credits, five projects and one Figma export, with no card required
- A low paid entry point at 17.50 USD a month for 1,200 credits and up to 200 screens
- Purchased credits carry lifetime validity, unlike the credits bundled into a subscription
- An MCP server on npm brings the whole toolset into six development environments
Cons
- Compliance documentation is essentially absent: no GDPR mention anywhere, no DPA, no subprocessor list, no Article 27 representative
- Neither the hosting country nor any data retention period is published, and no security certification is cited
- The site contradicts itself on pricing: the homepage FAQ describes Premium and Ultimate plans that the pricing page does not sell
- Prices are rendered in JavaScript on the pricing page, so the visible grid can come up empty and the amounts only appear in the static block
- No refunds at all, on subscriptions or on credit purchases, and subscription credits are lost on cancellation
- Only the front end is generated; backend logic remains a developer's job, and accounts are single-user outside Enterprise
- Corporate identity is inconsistent: the footer reads UXMagic AI Technologies Inc. while the structured data declares UXMagic Inc., and the data controller sits in Bengaluru rather than at the declared Delaware address
Pricing & Plans
A permanent free plan is available at no cost and without a credit card, offering 30 one-time credits, up to five screens, five projects and one Figma export. The lowest paid entry point is UX Magic Pro at 17.50 USD per month, which includes 1,200 monthly credits, up to 200 screens, unlimited projects and 250 Figma exports. An Enterprise tier is quoted on request. All prices are stated in US dollars, billing is monthly or annual, and the annual commitment is advertised at up to 50 percent less than monthly.
- 30 one-time credits
- up to 5 screens
- 5 projects
- 1 Figma export
- no credit card required
- with access to UI Design
- Wireframe
- Flow Mode
- 1
- 200 monthly credits
- up to 200 screens
- unlimited projects
- 250 Figma exports
- and every free feature without limits
- credit allocation sized to the team
- unlimited AI-generated screens
- unlimited seats
- SSO and SAML authentication
- team admin dashboard
- shared design system and component library
- priority support with a guaranteed response time
- dedicated onboarding
- Additional credits can be purchased at any time from the dashboard
Data, GDPR & hosting
A consolidated view of how UXMagic handles your data.
GDPR overview
The GDPR is never mentioned. Across the fourteen pages collected, including their raw HTML, the acronym does not appear once, and there is no trust or security page, no Data Processing Agreement, no subprocessor list and no Article 27 representative. The privacy policy does, however, set out four rights that mirror the regulation: access, rectification and erasure, restriction of processing, and data portability. It also names a data controller, with a postal address in Bengaluru, a telephone number and the address hello@uxmagic.ai. Security is described only as internal Information Security Requirements, with no certification cited. Google Analytics is used and a cookie settings control sits in the footer. The privacy policy is dated 23 February 2025, the terms 23 February 2026.
Who owns the data?
The vendor is unambiguous about the output: everything generated on the platform, whether a UI design, a wireframe, exported code or an asset, belongs to the user, with no licensing restriction and no attribution requirement. Worth noting is that this promise lives in the homepage FAQ, not in the Terms of Use, which say nothing at all about intellectual property in generated content. Personal data is a separate matter: UX Magic collects names, email addresses, passwords and payment details, and its privacy policy allows it to share that data with third-party service providers such as IT hosting and technical support, with group entities, and with public authorities where the law requires it.
Reuse rights
Users may reuse what they generate without asking permission. The homepage FAQ states that designs, wireframes, exported code and assets can be used for any commercial project, client work or product without limitation, and that no licensing restriction applies. In practice that reuse runs through the export paths the tool offers: Figma layers, HTML, React, Tailwind, Framer and Webflow. No attribution to UXMagic is required anywhere on the site. Work can also be shared with others, either by inviting named collaborators by email on a given project or by circulating a link that admits anyone who opens it. The one caveat is contractual: the Terms of Use are silent on ownership and reuse, so the commitment rests on a FAQ answer rather than on the agreement the user signs.
Data retention & training
Hosting summary
The site says almost nothing about where data lives. Across the fourteen pages collected there is no hosting country, no region, no data centre and no named cloud provider, and there is no trust or security page to consult. The only claim on the subject is a homepage FAQ line about encrypted data storage and secure cloud hosting, with no supplier named and no certification cited. The privacy policy adds that data may be shared with third-party IT hosting providers, again unnamed. Two jurisdictions do appear in the company's own documents, and they differ: the declared head office is at 8 The Green, Ste R, Dover, Delaware, in the United States, while the data controller named in the privacy policy sits in Bengaluru, India. For the record, the domain currently resolves to a Microsoft Azure address in the United States, but that is a technical observation about the website, not a statement by the vendor about where customer data is stored.
Things to keep in mind
Risks and trade-offs to weigh before adopting UXMagic.
- Nothing on the site addresses the GDPR, and there is no DPA or subprocessor list, which leaves any processing of European personal data undocumented
- Neither the hosting jurisdiction nor a retention period is published, so you cannot tell where your uploads live or how long they stay
- The commitment not to train on your data is worded as never used to train external AI models, which says nothing about internal training
- Ownership of what you generate is promised in a FAQ answer, not in the Terms of Use, which are silent on intellectual property
- Cloning an existing site reproduces someone else's layout: fine as inspiration, risky if the result ships as your own
- Uploading a screenshot of an internal product sends that interface to a third-party service, which may not be what your security policy allows
- Generating a plausible screen in seconds makes it tempting to skip user research, and screens produced by the same model tend to converge on the same look
Setup & Integrations
Technical difficulty
Very low for everyday use. You create an account, type a prompt and get screens; the vendor insists no design background and no Figma expertise are needed, and nothing is installed locally. Exporting to Figma is one click, or a plugin you install from the Figma community. The one step that calls for a developer is the IDE connection: you generate a UXMagic API key, install the MCP server from npm and paste a JSON configuration into Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Antigravity or Claude Desktop. Three short guides in the documentation cover exactly that.
Deployment
Integrations
Behind UXMagic
Social
Resources
All the official URLs gathered for verification and reference.
Alternatives
Tools that compete with or complement UXMagic.
Frequently asked questions
What exactly does UXMagic take as input?
What can I export, and in what format?
Is the exported code really usable in production?
Is there a free plan, and what does it include?
How much is the cheapest paid plan?
How do credits work, and do they expire?
Can I get a refund?
Who owns the designs and the code I generate?
Does UXMagic document its GDPR compliance?
Can I use UXMagic from my code editor?
Should you pick UXMagic?
UXMagic makes a coherent bet: rather than compete on the prettiness of a mockup, it tries to own the whole stretch between an idea and a front end someone can actually run. Four ways in, a genuine two-way relationship with Figma, code that comes out in HTML, React and Tailwind, and an MCP server that carries the whole thing into the editor where developers already work. That combination is not common, and it explains why the product positions itself against Uizard and Google Stitch rather than against pure mockup tools.
The commercial terms are unusually easy to test. A permanent free plan, no card required, then 17.50 USD a month for 1,200 credits and up to 200 screens. Purchased credits do not expire. Designs and code are handed to the user with no licensing strings attached.
What holds it back is everything that surrounds the product rather than the product itself. The site never mentions the GDPR, publishes no DPA and no subprocessor list, names no hosting country, states no retention period and cites no security certification, which puts any regulated buyer in an awkward position. Smaller inconsistencies point the same way: a pricing FAQ describing plans that the pricing page does not sell, a footer company name that differs from the one in the structured data, and a data controller in Bengaluru against a declared head office in Delaware. These are the marks of a company founded in 2024 that has grown faster than its paperwork.
For designers, product managers, founders and front-end developers who want to move from idea to structured screens quickly, it is worth the hour it takes to try. For anyone who has to answer a compliance questionnaire, the missing documentation is the first thing to raise with the vendor.
- Choosing a selection results in a full page refresh.
- Opens in a new window.