Nonverbia
Nonverbia is an AI meeting assistant for sales teams. Its assistant, Stella, joins video and in-person meetings, then reads tone, attention and body language to surface buying signals, coach reps and update the CRM.
What is Nonverbia?
Nonverbia is a conversation-intelligence platform built for sales teams, published by the Czech company Nonverbia.com s.r.o. Its assistant is named Stella. She joins Zoom, Google Meet and Microsoft Teams calls once the calendar is connected, and captures face-to-face meetings through the iOS and Android apps — you place the phone on the table — or from a recording you upload.
Where a note-taker gives you the words, Stella is sold on the layer above them. Alongside the transcript she analyses vocal delivery, meaning confidence, hesitation, pace and laughter, plus attention and engagement across the call. On the Business tier and above she adds body language and video signals such as eye contact, nods and reactions. Each call comes back as a summary, timestamped buying signals, deal risks, a buyer-readiness score, action items, private coaching pointers, a follow-up email drafted in the rep's own voice, a CRM update and a next step on the calendar — roughly two minutes after hanging up, for review and approval rather than automatic sending.
Before a meeting, Stella produces a thirty-second brief: who is on the call, what was covered last time, what was promised and what is still open. Stella Skills are custom prompts that run automatically on every call, letting a team encode its own playbook, its frameworks — MEDDICC, SPICED, Challenger or its own — and its objection handling, so the coaching sounds like the team rather than a generic model. Allowances run from two Skills on the free plan to unlimited on Enterprise.
The product is meant to be consumed where reps already work: Slack, Gmail, Outlook, the calendar and the CRM, rather than in a dashboard of its own. It exposes a REST API, webhooks and an MCP server, connects to Zapier, Make and n8n, and can be queried in plain language from Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini. Transcription is advertised in 99+ languages, including meetings held in two languages at once.
The vendor sizes the tool for teams of two to fifty and describes it as rep-first: feedback reaches the salesperson before the manager. Real-time in-call coaching, prominent in the marketing, is described as an early pilot rather than a shipped feature.
What it does
- Joins Zoom, Google Meet and Teams calls automatically, and captures in-person meetings from a phone
- Transcribes the conversation and analyses tone, attention, engagement and body language
- Surfaces timestamped buying signals, deal risks and a buyer-readiness score for each call
- Drafts a personalised follow-up email and pushes a CRM update for review
- Delivers private coaching pointers to the rep, tied to specific moments in the call
- Briefs you for thirty seconds before a meeting on history, promises and open points
- Answers plain-language questions about your calls from Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini
When to use Nonverbia / When not to
A quick filter to help you decide if Nonverbia is the right fit.
When to use Nonverbia
- B2B sales reps who run back-to-back video calls and lose hours a week to notes, CRM entry and follow-up emails
- Sales managers who want consistent, evidence-based coaching across a whole team instead of the few calls they had time to review
- Sales operations and revenue teams chasing clean CRM data without relying on reps to type it in
- Small and mid-sized sales teams — the vendor sizes the product for two to fifty people and prices it well below enterprise platforms
- Teams selling in Czech, Slovak or German, and field sellers who need in-person meetings captured from a phone on the table
When not to use Nonverbia
- Organisations whose procurement requires a formal security audit: SOC 2 is claimed on two pages but no report, auditor or trust page is published
- Teams that cannot reliably obtain participant consent, since the tool analyses the behaviour of everyone on the call and the vendor places that duty entirely on the customer
- Anyone looking for a general-purpose meeting recorder: every output is built around the sales cycle, from buying signals to deal risks
- Developers who need a documented API, as the REST API, webhooks and MCP server are sold from the Pro tier but documented nowhere publicly
- Teams running long workshops on the cheaper tiers, where a single meeting is capped at 45 minutes on Free and 90 minutes on Pro
How to use Nonverbia
A typical end-to-end flow, from setup to results.
- Create an account on the web app and sign in with Google, Apple or Microsoft — no credit card is requested
- Connect your calendar, Google or Outlook, so the assistant knows which meetings to join
- Let Stella join your Zoom, Google Meet or Microsoft Teams calls automatically
- For face-to-face meetings, install the iOS or Android app and leave the phone on the table during the conversation
- Alternatively, upload an existing recording and it is analysed the same way as a live call
- Set your context once: your playbook, your sales framework, your usual objections and next-step wording
- Add Stella Skills — custom prompts that then run automatically on every call
- Read the thirty-second brief the assistant prepares before each meeting
- About two minutes after the call, review the notes, the drafted follow-up email and the suggested CRM update, then approve them
- Connect Slack, Gmail, Outlook and your CRM, or query your meetings in plain language from Claude, ChatGPT or Gemini
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Analyses delivery, not just words: tone, attention and body language are a genuine differentiator among meeting assistants
- The whole post-call chain — notes, follow-up email, CRM update, next step — arrives about two minutes after hanging up
- A permanent free plan plus a thirty-day trial of the Business tier with no credit card
- Entry pricing of $9 per user per month sits far below the enterprise conversation-intelligence platforms it compares itself to
- European publisher: Prague-based, Czech law, Standard Contractual Clauses for transfers, and identifiable customer data excluded from model training unless the customer opts in
- Unusually concrete legal and service commitments for a young company — 99.5% monthly uptime with quantified service credits, tiered support response times and 48-hour breach notification
- Open technically: REST API, webhooks, MCP server, Zapier, Make and n8n, plus published iOS and Android apps for in-person capture
Cons
- The site contradicts itself on price in three places, with different plan names and different amounts, so it is impossible to tell from the website alone what you would actually pay
- The free trial is advertised as thirty days on two pages and fourteen days on two others
- SOC 2 is claimed on the product and integrations pages with no trust page, no report and no named auditor
- No sub-processor list is published: a register exists but is only made available to customers
- No hosting country is named — the privacy policy only describes processing zones, one of which is the United States
- Performance figures are numerous and very precise (+18% win rate, 32% more deals closed, 45% better forecast accuracy) with no methodology or source attached
- The API is sold from the Pro tier but has no public documentation, and the site has no contact page at all
Pricing & Plans
A permanent free plan is available, limited to 100 meeting minutes per month, two seats and thirty days of history. The cheapest paid tier displayed is Pro at USD 9.00 per user per month, followed by Business at USD 22.00 per user per month and an Enterprise tier priced on request. Every new account also starts with a thirty-day trial of the Business plan, two seats included, with no credit card required. Prospective buyers should note that the pricing page's own FAQ and the homepage FAQ quote different amounts and different plan names from the pricing cards, so the figures above should be confirmed with the vendor.
- 100 meeting minutes monthly
- up to 2 seats
- 45-minute maximum per meeting
- 30 days of history
- transcript-only playback
- 2 Stella Skills
- mobile app and in-person capture
- voice and tone analysis
- 1
- 000 minutes per seat pooled across the team
- 90-minute maximum per meeting
- 180 days of history
- audio playback
- 5 Stella Skills per seat
- Zapier and Make
- Claude
- unlimited minutes and history
- 3-hour maximum per meeting
- body language and video analysis
- video playback
- manager dashboard and team comparison
- CRM integration with full deal context
- 10 Stella Skills per seat
- premium Skills
- unlimited Stella Skills
- single sign-on
- your own logo and branding
- custom integration support
- dedicated account manager
- private support Slack channel
- data migration support
- invoice billing
Data, GDPR & hosting
A consolidated view of how Nonverbia handles your data.
GDPR overview
GDPR compliance is claimed explicitly, with a "GDPR compliant" badge on the demo page and a "GDPR & SOC2 compliant" line on the product page. The framework behind it is unusually detailed for a company this young. The customer is the controller of meeting content and Nonverbia the processor; the terms carry full processing clauses — documented instructions, staff confidentiality, assistance with data-subject requests and impact assessments, audits on thirty days' notice, new sub-processors on fifteen days' notice with a right to object. Transfers outside the EEA rely on the 2021/914 Standard Contractual Clauses with UK and Swiss addenda. Breaches are notified within 48 hours. The supervisory authority named is the Czech Úřad pro ochranu osobních údajů, and privacy requests go to a dedicated address. The weak point is not the paperwork: obtaining consent from the people being analysed is left entirely to the customer.
Who owns the data?
The customer keeps full ownership of everything fed into the platform — recordings, screen shares, chat, transcripts and meeting metadata. The privacy policy states plainly that nothing in it transfers ownership to Nonverbia, and the terms repeat the point. What the customer grants instead is a licence: worldwide, non-exclusive and royalty-free, limited to hosting, processing, analysing and improving the service. Nonverbia owns the platform itself, its software, algorithms and documentation. Two asymmetries are worth knowing: the insights generated from your calls come back to you under a perpetual licence for internal use only once invoices are paid, and any feedback or suggestion you send the vendor becomes theirs to exploit without limit.
Reuse rights
Within your own organisation the material is yours to reuse freely. The terms grant a perpetual licence — one that survives termination — to use, copy and distribute the insights Stella produces for internal business purposes, conditional only on having paid what is owed. No further permission is needed to circulate a summary, a coaching note or a call score internally, or to push them into your CRM. The limits are on redistribution rather than reuse: you may not resell, rent or otherwise open the service itself to third parties, and the licence covers internal purposes rather than commercial redistribution of the outputs. Export is explicit — during the subscription and for thirty days after it ends, content and insights can be pulled out as MP4, WAV, VTT, CSV, JSON or PDF. Note that operational metrics about how you use the service, and any suggestion you send the vendor, run the other way: those are treated as Nonverbia's confidential information and can be used for any commercial purpose.
Data retention & training
Hosting summary
No hosting country, data centre or infrastructure provider is named anywhere on the site, which is the main gap in an otherwise detailed privacy framework. What the publisher does state is that Nonverbia.com s.r.o. operates from the Czech Republic within the European Union, and that personal information may be handled across EU territories, United States locations and further jurisdictions. Transfers leaving the EEA, the United Kingdom or Switzerland towards countries without an adequacy decision rely on the 2021/914 Standard Contractual Clauses, using modules 2 and 3 as appropriate, with the UK addendum and Swiss adaptations, backed by encryption and access restrictions. The website's own analytics run on an EU-hosted PostHog instance. Security measures described include encryption in transit and at rest, identity and access management, continuous monitoring and logging, redundancy, vulnerability management and secure development practices. The site itself is served behind Cloudflare, whose anycast address resolves in the United States — that says nothing about where meeting recordings are actually stored.
Things to keep in mind
Risks and trade-offs to weigh before adopting Nonverbia.
- The site publishes three different sets of prices and plan names — the pricing cards, the pricing FAQ and the homepage FAQ all disagree — and four different statements about whether the free trial lasts fourteen or thirty days. Verify what you will actually be charged before committing.
- Everyone in the meeting is analysed, not just the subscriber: facial expressions, eye contact, nods and tone. The duty to inform those people and obtain their consent is placed entirely on the customer, and presence indicators are only shown where the conferencing platform allows them.
- SOC 2 compliance is claimed on two pages with no trust page, no report and no named auditor, while the terms promise only summary descriptions of security measures on reasonable request. Treat the claim as unverified.
- Performance claims are unusually precise and entirely unsourced: 18% higher win rates, 32% more deals closed, 45% better forecast accuracy, 23% shorter cycles, six to eight hours saved per week. No methodology or sample is given.
- Scoring how a person came across is inherently reductive. A buyer-readiness number attached to a human conversation invites managers and reps alike to trust the figure over their own reading of the room, and to coach towards the metric rather than towards the customer.
- No sub-processor list and no hosting country are published, and processing may take place in the United States. For a tool holding recordings of your commercial conversations, that is a meaningful gap in transparency.
- The company was incorporated on 30 July 2024 with share capital of CZK 1,000 and no external investor on record. Recordings of your sales pipeline would sit with a very young business, so plan your export path — thirty days after termination — accordingly.
Setup & Integrations
Technical difficulty
Low for the intended user. You sign up with a Google, Apple or Microsoft account, connect your calendar, and the assistant joins calls on its own; the vendor claims setup in under five minutes. In-person capture needs nothing beyond the mobile app. Nothing new has to be adopted day to day, since results land in Slack, Gmail, Outlook, the calendar and the CRM. Optional configuration — custom prompts, your playbook and frameworks — takes more thought but no technical skill. Only the API, webhooks, MCP server and single sign-on call for a technical profile.
Deployment
Apps stores
Integrations
Supported languages
Behind Nonverbia
Fundraising
Social
Resources
All the official URLs gathered for verification and reference.
Alternatives
Tools that compete with or complement Nonverbia.
Frequently asked questions
How is Nonverbia different from an AI note-taker?
Which meeting platforms does it work with?
How much does it cost?
Is there a free trial, and does it need a card?
Is my data used to train AI models?
How long is meeting data kept?
Do the other people in the meeting have to be told?
Is this a surveillance tool for managers?
Is there an API, and where is it documented?
Who is behind Nonverbia and what is the minimum age?
Should you pick Nonverbia?
Nonverbia is a real, well-documented product rather than a landing page with promises attached. The publisher is identified and verifiable in the Czech commercial register, the legal pages are long and specific to what the software actually does, four priced tiers come with a detailed comparison table, and mobile apps are published on both stores. Its differentiator is genuinely uncommon: most conversation-intelligence tools analyse the transcript, while this one is built around delivery — tone, attention and, on the higher tiers, body language — and returns the whole post-call chain of notes, follow-up email, CRM update and next step within minutes. For a small European sales team, the combination of an entry price of $9 per user, a permanent free plan, Prague-based operations and Standard Contractual Clauses for transfers is an unusual one.
The reservations are just as concrete. The site contradicts itself on its own prices in three separate places and on the length of its free trial in four, which is a poor signal on a page whose job is to be trusted with a purchasing decision. SOC 2 is asserted twice with nothing published behind it. The performance figures are precise to the point of implausibility and carry no methodology. The company was incorporated in July 2024, and the real-time coaching that features heavily in the marketing is described as an early pilot.
One consideration is specific to this category rather than to this vendor: the tool analyses the behaviour of everyone in the meeting, and the responsibility for informing those people and collecting their consent rests entirely with the customer. That should be settled before deployment, not after.
- Choosing a selection results in a full page refresh.
- Opens in a new window.