addJuris Contracts
A free, browser-based first-line review of commercial contracts. Upload a contract, state whether you sit on the supplier or the customer side, and receive either a clean bill or a numbered list of issues within seconds.
What is addJuris Contracts?
addJuris Contracts is a single-page web tool that runs an AI first-line review of a commercial contract. You drop a file into the page, tell it which side of the deal you are on, press a button, and a few seconds later you get one of two answers: a clean No issues found, or a numbered list of the points the model considers problematic.
The distinguishing idea is the role. Before it analyses anything, the tool asks you to declare your position under the contract: supplier, seller, service provider, recipient or licensor on one side; customer, buyer, service recipient, discloser or licensee on the other. The same clause is rarely a risk for both parties, and the review is written from the perspective you claim. Very few free tools make that choice explicit.
What it does not do is stated just as plainly. addJuris describes the exercise as a check against rough general contractual requirements that can be applied to most contracts, not an assessment under any particular national law. Its sibling services on the same domain are narrower: dispute analysis with claim drafting and review of public procurement decisions are both announced under Finnish law, alongside a contract negotiation scenario tool. This one deliberately stays generic.
The publisher is addJuris Oy, a Finnish legal consultancy that builds digital services for legal work and says they suit private individuals as much as practising lawyers. Technically it is a single-page application backed by a server-side review function; there is no account, no installation and no API.
A few practical limits are worth knowing before you start. The drop zone advertises PDF, DOC, DOCX, TXT and RTF, while the site's own FAQ mentions only PDF and DOCX up to 3 MB, and the two statements contradict each other. Reviews are capped at 50 a day and time out after 120 seconds, so long agreements will not go through. Above all, you must strip every piece of personal data from the document before uploading it, which is a real constraint on live contracts. Nothing is retained afterwards: neither the file nor the analysis survives the session. The service is free, priced at zero euros, and runs from a domain registered in February 2026.
What it does
- Run an AI first-line review of a commercial contract in a single pass
- Analyse the same contract from the supplier side or from the customer side
- Get a numbered list of potential issues, or an explicit confirmation that none were found
- Screen NDAs, supplier agreements, service contracts and licences against general contractual requirements
- Take a first look before sending a contract to a lawyer
- Work with no account, no installation and no API key
- Have the document discarded as soon as the result is displayed
When to use addJuris Contracts / When not to
A quick filter to help you decide if addJuris Contracts is the right fit.
When to use addJuris Contracts
- Small businesses and startups that sign commercial contracts without an in-house lawyer
- Freelancers and independent consultants reviewing client, agency or licensing agreements
- Procurement and sourcing officers who need a quick read on a supplier agreement
- Sales and account managers checking the terms of a deal from their own side of it
- Lawyers and paralegals wanting a fast triage pass before a full manual review
When not to use addJuris Contracts
- Anyone looking for actual legal advice or a binding opinion, a role the service explicitly refuses
- Teams whose contracts cannot realistically be stripped of personal data before upload
- Users working on long or complex agreements, since the review is abandoned after 120 seconds
- Organisations that need a data processing agreement, a named subprocessor list or a declared hosting jurisdiction
- High-volume contract operations: usage is capped at 50 reviews a day and there is no API
How to use addJuris Contracts
A typical end-to-end flow, from setup to results.
- Open the tool in your browser: there is no sign-up, no login and nothing to install
- Redact the contract offline first, removing names, addresses, identification numbers and contact details
- Under 'Your role under the contract', pick the side you are on, supplier or customer
- Drag and drop the file into the upload area, or click it to browse for the file
- Check the file name and size shown, and clear it with the cross if you picked the wrong one
- Press 'Make Review'; the button stays inactive until both a file and a role are set
- Wait while the button reads 'Reviewing…', the request being abandoned after 120 seconds
- Read the outcome: a green 'No Issues Found.' panel, or a numbered list under 'Issues Found'
- Copy anything you want to keep, because nothing is saved and the result cannot be retrieved later
- Repeat with another contract if you need to, within the daily limit of 50 reviews
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Completely free and account-free, so there is no friction at all before the first result
- The supplier/customer role switch is unusually thoughtful for a tool this simple
- The retention policy is explicit and detailed: no database, no file system, nothing recoverable afterwards
- The LLM provider has undertaken not to use submitted material for model training
- The legal disclaimer is blunt and complete, with none of the usual marketing gloss
- An instant result on one page, understandable without reading any documentation
- The publisher is a properly registered Finnish legal consultancy, not an anonymous operator
Cons
- No postal address and no email address are published; the only channel is a form on the publisher's site
- The LLM provider is never named, no subprocessors are listed and no hosting location is declared
- No GDPR compliance claim, no data processing agreement, no DPO and no Article 27 representative
- The site contradicts itself on file formats: PDF, DOC, DOCX, TXT and RTF in the drop zone, PDF and DOCX only in the FAQ
- The application writes a persistent visitor identifier and logs visits and reviews, which the legal page never mentions
- The output is binary and unranked, with no severity, no score and no pointer to the clause concerned
- No history, no export, no API, no mobile app, and a hard ceiling of 50 reviews a day
Pricing & Plans
The service is provided free of charge in its entirety. The site's structured data prices the offer at 0 EUR, and there is no paid plan, no subscription, no trial and no payment method anywhere on the site, which does not even carry a pricing page. There is consequently no lowest paid price point to report. The only quantitative restriction is a usage ceiling of 50 reviews per day.
- full access to the contract review at 0 EUR
- with no account required and a ceiling of 50 reviews per day
Data, GDPR & hosting
A consolidated view of how addJuris Contracts handles your data.
GDPR overview
There is no GDPR compliance claim anywhere on the site. addJuris refers only to applicable data protection laws and never names the Regulation. Its approach is avoidance rather than governance: uploading personal data is forbidden outright, and the work of removing names, identification numbers, contact details and anything else that could directly or indirectly identify a natural person falls entirely on the user, who confirms by uploading that the document has been redacted. No data protection officer is named, no Article 27 representative is designated, no GDPR contact address is published, no data processing agreement is offered and no subprocessor list exists. No hosting country or region is declared. The publisher is established in Finland, and therefore inside the EU, but that comes from the company's own description of itself, not from any compliance statement.
Who owns the data?
The terms make no claim over the documents you upload, and in practice nothing is kept: contracts and the analyses drawn from them are processed in real time and never written to a database, a file system or any other persistent store. What addJuris does claim is the Service itself. All content and functionality provided through it is owned by or licensed to addJuris and protected by intellectual property law, so copying, modifying, distributing or building derivative works from any part of it requires prior written consent. No account exists on the public side of the site, so nothing you submit is attached to a named identity.
Reuse rights
Your contract is read in the browser, sent to a server-side review function together with the contractual role you selected, and passed to a large language model that addJuris never names. The site states that no uploaded data is stored or used for AI training, and that the LLM provider has undertaken not to use submitted material for model training or development purposes. The result is yours: nothing in the terms restricts what you do with the issues list, although addJuris disclaims all liability for decisions taken on the strength of it. One caveat, visible in the application rather than in the terms: a persistent browser identifier is written to local storage, page visits and reviews are logged to the vendor's database, and an internal dashboard aggregates them by contract type and role. The Important Information page mentions none of this.
Data retention & training
Hosting summary
No hosting jurisdiction is declared anywhere on the site. addJuris names neither a country, nor a region, nor a cloud provider, and the Important Information page acknowledges only that data may be processed by third-party systems, without identifying any of them. What can be observed from the outside is limited and proves little: the domain resolves to a Cloudflare anycast address, which says nothing about where processing actually takes place, and the application's back end appears to be a hosted database-and-functions platform whose region is not exposed. The contract itself is, by design, not hosted at all. It is processed in real time and nothing is written to persistent storage, so the question of where a document sits stops applying once the session ends. Browsing and usage logs are a different matter: they are written to a database whose location is undeclared. The publisher, addJuris Oy, is established in Finland and therefore inside the EU, but that is a fact about the company, not a statement about where data is processed. Anyone with a hosting requirement should ask before uploading.
Things to keep in mind
Risks and trade-offs to weigh before adopting addJuris Contracts.
- You must strip every piece of personal data before uploading, which on a real contract is tedious and is entirely your responsibility if you get it wrong
- The site also advises removing confidential and commercially sensitive material, which on an actual commercial contract can leave very little worth analysing
- The LLM provider is never named, so the commitment not to train on your material cannot be verified by anyone outside addJuris
- A green 'No Issues Found.' is easy to read as 'this contract is safe'; it means only that one generic pass found nothing, and the vendor disclaims liability even for a wrong analysis
- Leaning on a two-minute automated check instead of reading the contract yourself is precisely the habit such a tool encourages and its own disclaimer warns against
- The application stores a persistent browser identifier and logs your visits and reviews, none of which the Important Information page discloses
- The terms can be changed at any time without notice, and the page carries no effective date or version number, so you cannot tell what you agreed to or when it changed
Setup & Integrations
Technical difficulty
None to speak of. There is nothing to install, no account to create, no API key to obtain and no setting to configure: you open a page, choose your side of the contract, drop a file and click a button. Any ordinary browser will do. The only real preparation is not technical at all, since you have to redact the document by hand beforehand, removing names, addresses, identification numbers and contact details. That step, and not the software, is where the effort lies.
Deployment
Behind addJuris Contracts
Social
Resources
All the official URLs gathered for verification and reference.
Frequently asked questions
What exactly does the review do?
Which file formats can I upload?
Is my contract stored anywhere?
How much does it cost?
Do I need to create an account?
Does this count as legal advice?
Can I upload a contract that contains personal data?
Is my document used to train AI models?
Whose point of view does the analysis take?
What happens if the review does not finish?
Should you pick addJuris Contracts?
addJuris Contracts does one narrow thing and does not pretend otherwise. One page, one file, one verdict: either the model found nothing worth flagging, or it hands you a numbered list. For a free tool with no sign-up, that is a fair bargain.
Its genuine idea is the role switch. Asking whether you are the supplier or the customer before reading a single clause is the difference between a generic summary and a review that means something, and it costs the user exactly one click.
The legal writing is unusually honest. addJuris states plainly that this is not legal advice, that no client-attorney relationship arises, that it accepts no liability even when the model is wrong, and that documents and analyses are never stored. Those are not comfortable sentences to publish, and publishing them counts in the vendor's favour.
Where it falls short is documentation. There is no postal address, no email address, no named LLM provider, no subprocessor list, no declared hosting jurisdiction, no data processing agreement and no GDPR compliance claim. The application also drops a persistent browser identifier and logs visits and reviews while the legal page says nothing about cookies or analytics, a gap someone should close. And the requirement to strip all personal data before uploading, sensible as it is, sharply narrows what you can realistically run through it.
Take it for what it says it is: a free triage pass, useful for catching the obvious before a lawyer looks properly, and never a substitute for one. The service is very young, its domain having been registered in February 2026, so expect it to move. For a founder, a freelancer or a procurement officer facing a supplier agreement at short notice, it is worth two minutes. For anything that really matters, keep the lawyer.
- Choosing a selection results in a full page refresh.
- Opens in a new window.